![]() I thought it was too short, even though it ran for two hours. It all depends how you yourself dissolve in the narration. ![]() One of the scenes about the original identity at close to the end of the film was really a goosebump part. He's originally a writer who worked with some great television shows, and now this is his first film directional debut. I should praise the director who also wrote for it. The production quality was a genius, particularly for a television film.Īmazing casting. After watching the film, I browsed about that on the net and I stunned. ![]() A special awards should be given to the set decoration. One of the best depiction of the 19th century in a film. The locations were beautiful, especially if you love chilly English weather and the countryside hilly views. The music was even better and suitable to the tale. Suddenly there comes an interesting scene and then for next 5-10 minutes falls back with a casual life event. Throughout, there were lots of ups and downs in the narration. When the film enters the third act, there are more twist and turns in the tale. When a woman writes something, it's her that's judged.❞ > ❝When a man writes something, it's what he's written that's judged. Their struggle is not merely to turn their work into a book, but the family, especially their brother who was drifting away from everything posed a great challenge to them to look after him. It was one of the best juncture in this storytelling. Even newbie men would struggle on that phase. They took paper and pen, and began to express the reality of the society in words rather to focus on the trend in literature subjects. Though their contribution, their achievement was the beginning of the new path for women of those eras and onwards. In this film, it was not exactly a fight or protest against such discrimination in society. Even the last week, Elizabeth Banks falsely accused the Steven Spielberg for the same reason. At present, we're witnessing the rise of voice against the gender inequality in society all over the world in all the fields. At the beginning, it stumbles upon them, but very soon they overcome and takes the responsibility since they are very enthusiast in the literature work. It's the time the three sisters to make some quick decisions. I blame their father, as well as their brother, but still these sisters are one of the greatest historic figures I've come to learn about. I don't know the actual reason why those sisters remained unmarried, but I have a couple of perspective in my mind, that might be inappropriate to say out, yet the film kind of breaks the stereotype of women of those times. Their only hope is their brother who supposed to be a successful writer is now at worst as his doomed romance has taken him down with.Īs I know those eras were, particularly the women, it's about marrying at the young age and settling down with the husband. Motherless children, grown to adulthood, they struggle to keep the family name honourly in the community. Revolves around the Bronte family living in a small town, majorly focused on the three sisters in the span of three years, the most important years of their lives. Those four kids are the siblings and the story takes place in the mid 19th century England. A perfect clue for the viewers what's coming in the latter part of the story. For a tale like this, it was a great opening scene. That was that, in the next minute, it became a different film. So, when I saw the very first scene, as kids running around with flames on their heads, I thought it would be some kind of a fantasy film. I knew it was a period drama and about some famous writers. One of the reason was, I usually enjoy most of the BBC films. I did not bother to know everything before giving it a try. I was not excited to see it, because I have had no idea about whose biopic was this. **The three sisters all the literature lovers should know.**
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |